What details are "worth" mapping?
I'm currently mapping the village i live in (northern Germany). The building outlines and streets where already done by somebody else, so i mainly added the addresses to most buildings in my village and corrected some of the outlines. I did this with Organic Maps and later Vespucci.
Now my question: what other information is important enough to map?
I could go around and map every tree and specify the roof types for the buildings, but that would take ages and I think there are other details that are way more important to map for everyday openstreetmap users.
Is there some wiki page that lists the most important attributes that should be mapped? I searched on the OSM wiki but couldn't find such a list.
Thanks in advance.
reshared this
JASN_DE
in reply to shoki • • •Apart from the basic street layout, any information that's worth having for everyday life, e.g. bus stops, benches, trash cans, etc.
Also, you could try StreetComplete and see what infos are missing elsewhere.
like this
abeorch likes this.
abeorch
in reply to shoki • •OpenStreetMap community reshared this.
floquant
in reply to shoki • • •To me it would probably be "navigational" stuff, like bike/pedestrian crossings, sidewalks and bike paths, one-way streets and illegal turns etc. Plot some test routes for walking/biking/driving and verify the directions make sense. Then the main POIs if not already added, maybe some basic zoning? Also make sure that the features that already exist are properly tagged.
Anyway, I think you shouldn't focus too much on what "you're supposed to map" and just map the features that you find useful/interesting. There are a ton of ways OSM can be used, so start with your own use case, and by making it better for you you will make it better for everyone :)
like this
abeorch likes this.
astro_ray
in reply to shoki • • •infeeeee
in reply to shoki • • •Whatever you think. I met with mappers who only map rail and related stuff, others only different kind of pipes and manhole covers, some focus on electrical infrastructure, and street cabinets. Some people map anything that has a number or id. My favorite is street parking, lanes and sidewalks.
So map what you enjoy the most, this is not a job, it's a hobby.
like this
abeorch likes this.
goldfndr
in reply to infeeeee • • •man_made=manhole | Tags | OpenStreetMap Taginfo
taginfo.openstreetmap.orgOnno (VK6FLAB)
in reply to shoki • • •Anything that has a physical location or relationship can be mapped.
If you can find existing datasets you can add those to the map without needing to manually collect the data.
You can also consider things like floodplains, historical flooding records, traffic flows and anything else will a geographical bent.
This will never be finished because things are always in flux.
One thing that you should consider is what maintenance looks like. Keep track of where datasets came from and when you retrieved them. Some countries, regions and municipalities maintain public data that you might be able to use. Make sure you comply with any licences attached to the data.
You can also use things like the local cadastre which tracks land and building boundaries and ownership.
schnurrito
in reply to shoki • • •Things that someone might look for: shops, restaurants, vending machines, benches, trashcans, water fountains.
To make the map appear a lot more beautiful and complete: map parks, playgrounds, dog parks, sports pitches, etc. as areas; map any fences, walls and gates around and within them. Lots of playgrounds are just mapped as nodes, so if you find such cases, fix them.
ticho
in reply to schnurrito • • •I second this - things that someone might look for - for a simple reason: OSM will always need more people mapping, and if the maps are useful to more people, more people will use it and recommend it to their friends. And a small portion of those users will eventually become mappers. Some of those will even form or join a local mapping community.
So the more useful info there is, more mappers will come, and the feedback loop will take care of the rest. :)
improve7elephants
in reply to shoki • • •Ludrol
in reply to shoki • • •I think you should map what you enjoy mapping.
I map benches because I enjoy benches (444 mapped already.) and entrances that I use in my job.
Shops and services would be most useful along with bus stops and forest footpaths.
InsertUser
in reply to shoki • • •Points of interest and amenities are probably the next most useful. Things like street lighting and sidewalks quite helpful for pedestrians. It's more important that you are still enjoying mapping. If there is something that you know is useful but you find tedious it's ok to skip it and either leave it for someone else or come back to it later
As it sounds like you're on Android, I'd recommend @streetcomplete for easily adding detail while on the go.
@openstreetmap
like this
abeorch likes this.
OpenStreetMap community reshared this.
shoki
in reply to shoki • • •Thank you all for your answers! I'm overwhelmed with the amount of good tips and suggestions!
I'll probably test some of them and see if they're fun to mal and useful for my village.
m-p{3}
in reply to shoki • • •like this
HeerlijkeDrop likes this.
porotoman99
in reply to shoki • • •My general philosophy for how most people would use the map is "where are things and how do I get there?" With that in mind, I usually focus on adding stores, amenities, and other bits of infrastructure that people are likely to interact with, as well as making sure the roads and sidewalks are accurate.
I don't always feel like working on these things though, so there are some days where I will just map grass, trees, fences, or whatever else I find interesting at the time.
pietervdvn
in reply to shoki • • •MapComplete - editable, thematic maps with OpenStreetMap
mapcomplete.orgstrubbl
in reply to shoki • • •Thomas
in reply to shoki • • •all is important